About Me

Name: Mysterious_1
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Just Too Much

I know that everyone is entitled to an opinion.  I know that not everyone's opinion will agree with mine.  That's okay.  That's one of the great things about this country.  But there are some things that just ought not to be said in certain venues.

Besides being interested in politics, national security issues, the intersection of faith and culture, and a number of other "issues," I'm also interested in technology.  I subscribe to several technology-related e-mail news letters.  Technology would seem to me to be a somewhat apolitical topic.  At least that's what I though until this morning.  This morning I opened my copy of "Download Dispatch, Windows Edition" from Cnet.com.  Here's what
Peter Butler Senior Content Manager, CNET Download.com had to say in his article entitled "Worst Downloads of 2008":
Sure, you're all jazzed about Barack Obama and looking forward to a brighter 2009, but what about the catastrophes of 2008? I'm not talking about the financial meltdown, Sarah Palin, or The Love Guru...I'm talking about the worst downloads of the year.
Okay, we're all "jazzed" about the inauguration yesterday.  We should be, this is America.  This is how we transfer power after an election.  I'm sure that we're looking forward a brighter 2009.  No matter how 2008 was for us, we all hope for better things in 2009.  That's just human nature.

Here's where Mr. Butler flies of the rails as though he were a Huffington Post or Democratic Underground blogger.  When he lists Sarah Palin as one of the "catastrophes of 2008" on par with the financial meltdown he reveals himself as either another journalist in the tank for the Democrats or as a man with an extremely poorly tuned sense of humor.  Like I said, somethings just ought not to be written in certain venues.  Surely technology in and of itself, is apolitical.  I expect I wasn't the only person that was mildly bothered by this ridiculous comparison of Sarah Palin to the financial meltdown.  Almost half of the voters in the Presidential election voted for Sarah Palin for Vice President.  I hardly consider that a "catastrophe."
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Christians and Politics (Part 2)

In a previous post (Christians and Politics – Part 1) I discussed my observations concerning the attitudes that Christians have had about politics since the early 1960s.  I observed two rather contradictory approaches that Christians have taken toward politics.  One approach (prevalent in the 1960s and 1970s) was to eschew the political process altogether or to do no more than vote because of the perception that politics was corrupt and corrupting.  The other approach was to become immersed in politics, fully committing to party, candidate, or issue with the belief that the political process will be the “salvation” of the nation.  I also noted that I believed that both of these approaches to politics were wrong.

The question we have before us now is: “How should Christians take part in politics?”

CITIZENS OF ANOTHER REALM

But our citizenship is in heaven. And we eagerly await a Savior from there, the Lord Jesus Christ, (Philippians 3:20 NIV)
It is essential that we remember that as Christians our true citizenship is in heaven.  Yes, we are also citizens of the nation we live in.  We are obligated to fulfill our civic duties including:  paying taxes; obeying the laws; respecting the authority of the government; and rendering due respect to those who hold positions of leadership.

However, since our citizenship is in heaven, we have an obligation to represent our true king – Jesus Christ.  We are obligated to obey His commands and to represent Him, as ambassadors, here on earth.  An ambassador represents the ruler who him, not himself.  Once an ambassador begins to push a personal agenda instead of advancing the goals of the nation who sent him, he is no longer fulfilling his assigned role.  When the ambassador resists the instructions of his government and favors the positions of the country he is sent to, he’s “gone native.”  


INFLUENCERS IN THIS WORLD

"You are the salt of the earth. But if the salt loses its saltiness, how can it be made salty again? It is no longer good for anything, except to be thrown out and trampled by men. "You are the light of the world. A city on a hill cannot be hidden. Neither do people light a lamp and put it under a bowl. Instead they put it on its stand, and it gives light to everyone in the house. In the same way, let your light shine before men, that they may see your good deeds and praise your Father in heaven. (Matthew 5:13-16 NIV)
Jesus told His disciples that they were to be salt and light in the earth.  Both salt and light play vital roles in the physical world.  Salt preserves and gives flavor.  Light illuminates and dispels darkness.

Certainly as we look around we can see that the world and our nation are full of corruption and moral decay.  As Christians we should be providing the preservative that inhibits the corruption of the world around us.  We should be influencing the world we live in, creating an atmosphere that is conducive to moral uprightness.  All too often the world changes us rather than being changed by us.

We live in a dark place.  As Christians we should be a bright, shining beacon illuminating the world around us and sending darkness into retreat.  All too often we are overcome by the darkness rather than overcoming it.  In reality, darkness does not swallow up or dispel light; darkness is the absence of light.

IN BUT NOT OF

Where does this leave us?  On one hand, we are here.  We are surrounded by the culture.  Unless we become hermits, we cannot escape the culture.  On the other hand, we are not of this culture.  We have an obligation to understand the culture and the people in it but we must not be overcome by it, we must not “go native.”
We must be engaged with the culture, including the political process.  We must make a positive, Biblically-based impact on the cities, states, and nation we live in.  That can include supporting, or being, candidates with Biblically-based views of the issues that face our nation.

We must also keep in mind that politics, the political process, and politicians cannot change America and the world into what we would like it to be.  If we want to live in a nation that espouses Biblical values, we must realize that people need to be changed.  Only when the hearts of the people of the nation are changed by God and His Word will the ills of the nation and the world be remedied.  The Old Testament prophet, speaking for God, put it this way,
"I will put my law in their minds and write it on their hearts.”  (Jeremiah 31:33 NIV)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Christians and Politics (Part 1)

I have observed during the last few elections cycles that there is a tendency among Christians to think that (or at least to act like) a particular party, candidate, or issue advocacy group is the answer to all that ails the U.S.  The attitude seems to be, “If we can elect enough people from the X party, America will be a better place,” or “If only candidate Y gets elected, all these things that are wrong will get fixed;” or “If only this proposed legislation, supported by the Z group gets passed, the situation in our country (or state or locality) will change.”  Sadly, this isn’t true.

My parents have always, during my lifetime, been politically aware and regular voters.  I grew up in a home where we stayed current with the events of the day and talked about the issues.  We were also very active in our church so our views on issues were directed by Biblical principles.  During my early life (the 1960s and early 1970s) I don’t really remember that our friends from church were necessarily focused on politics or political issues.  There was even sort of an attitude that Christians shouldn’t be involved in politics, to the point that some did not vote.

As the 1970s were coming to an end and Ronald Reagan was making the run that led to his election as President in 1980, there was a change.  In 1980 a large group from my church participated in the county caucus to elect a slate of delegates to support Reagan at the District caucus.  At this same time, Jerry Falwell’s “Moral Majority” was coming to prominence on the national scene.  Christendom, or at least the Evangelical part of it, had caught the political bug.  The sense was that Christians could make a difference in the direction of the nation by supporting candidates and issues and by getting out and voting.  I’m sure that energizing Evangelical Christians, many of whom had remained outside the political arena for many years, effected the 1980 Presidential election.

In the last 30 or so years, the church has played a major role in leading the discussion of issues.  This is a good thing.  However, the “success” of candidates who support Biblical views on certain issues during this time frame may led us into the views and actions I referred to above:  That party politics is the solution to the nation’s and the world’s problems.  I’m convinced that this is a false view.

In summary, here’s what I’ve seen over approximately 50 years.  There was a time when Christians were disinclined to participate in the political process.  This was caused by a belief that politics was incompatible with Christianity, or that Christians could not make an impact on the political process.  Since the late 1970s the pendulum has swung to the other extreme.  Now many Christians seem to think that politics is the vehicle whereby the world will be changed.

With this background, I’ve been thinking about the manner in which Christians should view and participate in politics.  I believe that both of the views I’ve described above are incorrect.  If that’s true, what is the Biblical approach to the Christian’s participation in the political process?

I’m going to address this issue in upcoming posts. 

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"The Company You Keep"

Do not be misled: "Bad company corrupts good character." (1 Corinthians 15:33 NIV)

The arrest yesterday of Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich brings me back to the question: "How does one swim in the cesspool of Chicago politics without being tainted by it?"  If there are any "honest" politicians in the political mess that is the Chicago political machine, they would be the exception rather than the rule and would certainly be in danger of drowning.  I'll paraphrase something I heard on Fox News Channel while driving home from work yesterday evening:  "Illinois may not be the most corrupt political system in the nation but it's certainly a strong competitor."  (I don't know who said that but it sounds like a prosecutor.)

This brings me back to an issue raised by conservatives during the 2008 campaign season but generally ignored by the MSM.  What about Mr. Obama's associates?

At least two thousand years ago, it was well known that the people we surround ourselves with influence our character.  What about Mr. Obama's associates?

A very short review of some of his associations leave me concerned.  Here's just a short list to jog your memory:
Rev. Jeremiah Wright, his pastor for about 20 years, racist and America hater - How can you sit in the pews of a church for that long and be totally unaware of the underlying themes of the pastor's messages and the church's fundemental beliefs?

Bill Ayers, a founder of the Weather Underground and education professor, served on the boards of the Woods Foundation and the Chicago Annenberg Challenge with Mr. Obama - How do you start your first run for political office in the home of an unrepentant terrorist and radical educator, server on two boards, one of which funneled millions of dollars to the educational projects that were in line with Bill Ayers' views that education was a propaganda and indoctrination tool, and not be aware of and in agreement with his radical views?

Tony Rezko, a real estate investor, power broker, and now convicted fellon - Tony Rezko assisted the Obamas with the real estate deal that allowed them to purchase their home, a deal that looked shady at the time.

The list could go on but you get the idea.  How do you run in those circles without being like those people?  Mom always said: "You're known by the company you keep."  She also advised my to surround myself with people that would have constructive influences on my life.

On a somewhat realated note:  I am amazed at the depths to which politics in Illinois have sunk.  Things have changed dramatically since Abraham Lincoln came through there and was known as "Honest Abe."

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »